| 27/03/06
 There are serious questions for the Scottish Executive to answer over plans
  to burden farmers in Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (NVZs) with further regulation,
  according to NFU Scotland. Speaking after the last of five meetings on the
  issue, held last night in Dumfries, NFUS President John Kinnaird has challenged
  the authorities to prove that there is a scientific basis for the new rules. NFUS has hosted meetings in Dumfries, Dundee, Inverurie, Kinross,
                and Lauder so its members could press Scottish Executive and
                SEPA officials on new proposed NVZ restrictions, which are expected
                to be put out for official consultation shortly. The proposals
                mainly surround restrictions on when farmers can spread manure
                or fertiliser and the quantity that can be applied to fields. In the absence of hard scientific justification, NFUS has stressed
                that these latest proposed rules are symptomatic of an ever-increasing
                burden of regulation which is adding unnecessary cost and delivering
                little, if any, public benefit. Last month, NFUS called for an
                overhaul of the UK and Scottish system for implementing EU legislation
                and has proposed a new model to ensure that no new restrictions
                can be imposed without clear evidence of benefits. NFUS President John Kinnaird said: "Personally, I believe the NVZ designations we've had in
                the past are as much about appeasing Brussels as they are about
                delivering environmental benefit. "The 'regulate first, ask questions later' approach of
                government and its authorities is hammering farms and other rural
                businesses. Hot on the heels of ridiculous water abstraction
                proposals, we have new proposed restrictions in NVZs. If that
                wasn't bad enough, we have one Government department banning
                the use of tallow as a green fuel whilst another tries to encourage
                renewables and we have to spend time convincing authorities that
                field stones are not commercial waste. It is absurd. "Unless we see concrete proof that regulations are justifiable
                and will deliver benefit, we will not accept them. At the moment,
                I have not heard any compelling evidence out of our NVZ meetings
                that the latest proposed restrictions are based on sound science. "Government and its authorities have to get their act together.
                We are being constructive on this issue by proposing a new model
                which will bring common sense back into the regulatory process.
                We have raised this with Jim Wallace MSP as part of his own inquiry
                into over-regulation and we will be meeting the Cabinet Office
                inquiry team next week which is looking into the same subject.
 "The farming industry is not saying no to taking steps
                to protect the environment, but we are saying a very clear no
                to rules which are dressed up in those terms, but do nothing
                except raise revenue and harm farm sustainability." 
			   Question
              Marks Remain Over Agricultural Wages Board 
  NFUS
              Budget Reaction 
  NFUS
            Warns Of Possible Meat Hygiene Service Strike |